How L&D Leaders Can Navigate AI-Driven Change with Ashley Corcoran of The Home Depot
As learning organizations navigate rapid advances in technology, increasing demands for measurable business impact, and growing interest in AI, the need for strategic alignment has become more important than ever. In this episode of Learning Leader Spotlight, Lan Tran shares perspectives from a career that spans software
The conversation explores the emerging role of the learning technology strategist and why organizations need professionals who can bridge learning, technology, analytics, governance, and business strategy. Throughout the discussion, Lan emphasizes that technology should serve organizational goals, not drive them.
Lan Tran is a former senior learning leader who recently transitioned into consulting as a learning technology strategist. Her career includes experience in software development, learning design, learning technology management, and leadership roles supporting digital learning ecosystems.
Drawing on experience from organizations including Accenture, Kraft Heinz, and McDonald’s, Lan brings a unique perspective that combines technical expertise with a deep understanding of how people learn. Her work has focused on helping organizations create technology-enabled learning experiences that drive engagement, support business goals, and encourage meaningful behavior change.
Learning Technology Must Support Business Strategy
One of the central themes of the discussion is that learning technology should not exist independently of business priorities. Lan describes the learning technology strategist as someone responsible for ensuring that learning technology supports the learning strategy, which in turn supports the broader enterprise strategy.
This requires more than selecting platforms or maintaining systems. It involves understanding how technology influences learner experiences, administrative efficiency, reporting capabilities, and business outcomes. A successful strategy balances all of these dimensions simultaneously.
Lan notes that organizations often focus heavily on one area while overlooking others. A platform may provide an excellent learner experience but create excessive administrative burden. Alternatively, a system may deliver strong reporting capabilities but fail to engage employees. Technology strategy requires careful consideration of trade-offs and alignment across multiple stakeholder groups.
The role therefore becomes one of translation and coordination, helping IT teams, business leaders, HR professionals, vendors, and learning teams work toward common objectives.
Engagement Requires Ongoing Learning Culture, Not Just Content Delivery
Another recurring theme is the distinction between delivering learning and creating a learning culture.
Lan argues that many organizations treat learning systems as static repositories. Once content is uploaded and systems are configured, attention shifts elsewhere. However, learning cultures require continuous engagement and communication.
She compares learning platforms to streaming services, noting that organizations should actively promote new opportunities, highlight relevant content, and create reasons for employees to return regularly. Learning challenges, targeted communications, featured content, and timely connections to organizational priorities can all strengthen engagement.
Examples discussed include highlighting learning opportunities tied to events such as International Women’s Day, supporting broader cultural initiatives, and helping employees discover relevant content through proactive communication.
The underlying message is that technology alone does not create engagement. Organizations must actively curate experiences that encourage employees to explore, return, and participate in learning on an ongoing basis.
Measuring Learning Impact Requires More Than Completion Data
Lan raises concerns about how organizations evaluate learning effectiveness and the risks of relying exclusively on completion metrics.
She explains that completion rates often provide an incomplete picture of learning activity. Different content types are tracked differently across systems, and learner behavior does not always align with available reporting mechanisms. For example, employees may engage meaningfully with resources that are not automatically tracked, while completion statistics may fail to capture broader indicators of learning culture.
As learning leaders increasingly seek connections between learning and outcomes such as retention, performance, or sales results, accurate interpretation of data becomes critical.
According to Lan, learning technology strategists play an important role in helping organizations understand what data represents and how it should be interpreted. Without that perspective, analytics teams may unintentionally draw incorrect conclusions and misrepresent the relationship between learning and business outcomes.
The discussion reinforces the importance of combining data literacy with learning expertise. Understanding what to measure is just as important as the ability to collect metrics.
Business Metrics Every Instructional Designer Should Know
The Growing Importance of Translating Across Functions
A major theme throughout the episode is the need for individuals who can communicate effectively across disciplines.
Lan repeatedly describes situations in which learning professionals, IT teams, HR analytics groups, and technology vendors operate with different assumptions, terminology, and priorities. Even when everyone is working toward the same goal, misunderstandings can create barriers to progress.
The learning technology strategist serves as a translator between these groups. This includes understanding technical system capabilities, interpreting vendor language, explaining implications for learners and administrators, and helping stakeholders anticipate operational consequences of their decisions.
The role extends beyond technical expertise. It requires understanding user experience design, governance considerations, organizational culture, reporting requirements, compliance processes, and business priorities.
As AI and advanced learning technologies become more common, this translation capability becomes increasingly valuable. Organizations need people who can explain not only what technology can do, but also whether it should be used, how it should be governed, and what risks may accompany its implementation.
Start With Problems and Strategy, Not Technology
Perhaps the strongest position Lan expresses during the conversation is that organizations should begin with business challenges and learning goals rather than with technology solutions.
She identifies a common mistake in which organizations become captivated by new technologies and search for ways to use them. Whether discussing AI, virtual reality, or learning platforms, she advocates for a problem-first approach.
In her view, defining desired outcomes and learning requirements before selecting technology creates more flexibility and better decision-making. When organizations start with a platform, they often limit their thinking to existing capabilities and constraints.
Lan recalls her experience as a software developer, where designers who thought beyond technical limitations frequently inspired stronger and more innovative solutions. The same principle applies to learning technology strategy. Organizations should define what success looks like first and then determine which technologies can best support that vision.
This perspective is particularly relevant in conversations about AI. Rather than adopting AI because it is popular, organizations should identify genuine business or learning problems and evaluate whether AI provides a meaningful solution.
AI Creates New Opportunities and New Governance Questions
The conversation naturally turns to artificial intelligence and its growing influence across learning systems.
While optimistic about AI’s potential, Lan approaches the topic with careful consideration. She highlights opportunities such as AI-generated voiceovers and multilingual learning support, particularly for global audiences that may benefit more from spoken content than translated text.
At the same time, she emphasizes questions around data quality, governance, risk management, accuracy, legal considerations, and organizational readiness.
Not every company shares the same tolerance for risk. Some organizations may prefer careful testing and controlled implementation, while others may be more comfortable experimenting rapidly. Understanding these cultural differences becomes an important responsibility for anyone advising on technology decisions.
Lan’s position is not anti-technology. Rather, she advocates for thoughtful adoption driven by purpose, business needs, and organizational context.
User-Centered Design Still Matters
Despite advances in technology, Lan repeatedly returns to the importance of understanding learners.
She shares an example from a corporate university redesign process in which internal stakeholders preferred a platform design that ultimately received the fewest votes from end users. Employees selected a different interface because it helped them find what they needed more quickly.
The example illustrates a broader lesson: assumptions about learners are often inaccurate, even when informed by personas and experience. Testing with actual users remains essential.
Lan also notes that organizations frequently underestimate how much knowledge exists only in employees’ heads rather than in documented workflows and processes. Successful implementations require understanding how people actually work before making significant changes.
For learning leaders, this serves as a reminder that technology decisions should be informed by observation, feedback, and validation rather than assumptions.
Practical Takeaways for L&D and Business Leaders
Align Technology Investments With Strategic Outcomes
Before evaluating platforms, AI tools, or learning technologies, define the organizational challenges that need to be addressed. Technology decisions are most effective when they support clearly articulated business and learning goals.
Evaluate Learning Culture Beyond Completions
Consider metrics that capture engagement, participation, discovery, and broader learning behavior. Completion rates may provide useful information, but they rarely tell the whole story.
Build Internal Translation Capabilities
Whether through internal talent, external consultants, or trusted vendor partnerships, organizations benefit from individuals who can translate between learning, IT, analytics, and business stakeholders.
Test Assumptions With Real Users
Pilot solutions, gather feedback, and validate design decisions with representative learners. User preferences and behaviors often differ from stakeholder assumptions.
Assess AI Through a Risk-and-Value Lens
Evaluate AI initiatives based on the problems they solve, the value they create, and the risk tolerance of the organization. Adoption decisions should reflect both opportunity and context.
Resources or Tools Mentioned
Closing Reflection
Lan Tran presents a compelling view of learning technology strategy as a discipline that extends far beyond platform administration. The role sits at the intersection of learning, technology, analytics, governance, and business performance, requiring both technical fluency and human-centered thinking.
As organizations continue to expand their use of AI and digital learning technologies, the ability to connect business needs with meaningful learner experiences will become increasingly important. The conversation reinforces a clear message: technology delivers the greatest value when it is guided by strategy, grounded in user needs, and focused on measurable organizational outcomes.
Ready to Work with Us?
Does your L&D team have more projects than people? At TrainingPros, we match organizations with experienced consultants who lead with strategy, so you can connect learning decisions to real business goals. We support teams across compliance, customer service, leadership and supervisory development, product knowledge, and sales, as well as information technology, software, and learning platforms. Whether you’re rethinking onboarding, scaling a program, or upgrading the tools behind it, we help you move from reactive delivery to results-driven capability building.
TrainingPros has been named a Top 20 Staffing Company internationally by Training Industry, and recognized as a Champion of Learning by the Association for Talent Development (ATD)—an international honor that reflects our dedication to excellence in corporate learning. These accolades underscore TrainingPros’ unwavering commitment to delivering high-quality, tailored training solutions.
If your projects need instructional design consultants, eLearning developers, or other learning & development consultants for your custom content projects, reach out to one of our industry-expert relationship managers today.